Spb Benchmark index 1194
  CPU index 1589
  File system index 877
  Graphics index 1363 
  ActiveSync index ——
  Platform index 973
  Write 1 MB file (KB/sec) 1204
  Read 1 MB file (MB/sec) 21.8
  Copy 1 MB file (KB/sec) 1202
  Write 10 KB x 100 files (KB/sec) 561
  Read 10 KB x 100 files (MB/sec) 7.39
  Copy 10 KB x 100 files (KB/sec) 450
  Directory list of 2000 files (thousands of files/sec) 16.3
  Internal database read (records/sec) 1283
  Graphics test: DDB BitBlt (frames/sec) 134
  Graphics test: DIB BitBlt (frames/sec) 21.3
  Graphics test: GAPI BitBlt (frames/sec) 164
  Pocket Word document open (KB/sec) 30.9
  Pocket Internet Explorer HTML load (KB/sec) 6.42
  Pocket Internet Explorer JPEG load (KB/sec) 185
  File Explorer large folder list (files/sec) 461
  Compress 1 MB file using ZIP (KB/sec) 203
  Decompress 1024x768 JPEG file (KB/sec) 5604
  Arkaball frames per second (frames/sec) 107
  CPU test: Whetstones MFLOPS (Mop/sec) 0.079
  CPU test: Whetstones MOPS (Mop/sec) 556.9
  CPU test: Whetstones MWIPS (Mop/sec) 5.15
  Memory test: copy 1 MB using memcpy (MB/sec) 77.5
  ActiveSync: upload 1 MB file (KB/sec) ——
  ActiveSync: download 1 MB file (KB/sec) ——

    令我们比较意外的是，828+的成绩在各项子测试中都要逊于前辈818。不过通过Spb Benchmark电脑端的小工具，我们将这些数据上传到了spbsoftware的官方网站，并通过它们的数据库资料和一些目前主流的Pocket PC进行了对比。我们欣喜的发现，该机在各项比拼中都超过了惠普iPAQ h5550（2003，400MHz），而在和华硕MyPal A716（2003，400MHz）的较量中也是互有胜负。

(责任编辑：关美纳)